Therefore, If your intent to cause injury is proven and it truly is further proven that within the ordinary course of nature, that injury would result in death, that matter is currently objective as well as intention to destroy (the main aspect that must
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, It is usually a very well-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
record of the department there isn't any record out there whatsoever regarding promotion of the petitioner(Promotion)
For the foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to the tradition that the reader should be capable to deduce the logic from the decision and the statutes.[4]
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders trying to keep in view that among the respondents has retired from service as pointed out via the counsel to the respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected to the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.
In certain jurisdictions, case law can be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by executing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently perilous that it must in all likelihood cause death, causes the death with the this kind of person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
A lessen court may well not rule against a binding precedent, even if it feels that it is actually unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. Should the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it may possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow for a judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were read more advised from the boy’s past, they requested if their children were Secure with him in their home. The therapist confident them that they'd nothing at all to worry about.